Homophobes say the most homoerotic things, part n+1

Joe Rehyansky over at The Daily Caller ruminates on the travesty of U.S. soldiers having to shower with gay men:

Now back to that communal shower. It’s no secret that men are generally much more susceptible to sexual arousal through visual stimuli than are most women. Many gays will deny that this is the case with them, but why then is the Internet saturated with gay porn? I don’t claim to be a Constitutional law scholar on a par with President Obama, but shouldn’t the overwhelmingly straight warriors who answer their county’s call be spared the indignity of showering with other men who achieve lascivious enjoyment from the sight of those lithe naked bodies, and who may be tempted to seek more than the view? They are, after all, guys. If a Constitutional right to privacy that guarantees access to abortionists can be summoned from thin air, certainly the prohibition against involuntary servitude should prevent unwilling heterosexual men from providing beefcake parades without their informed consent, at least penumbrally [sic].

Okay, so, in summary:

communal shower [...] men [...] sexual arousal [...] gays [...] gay porn [...] warriors [...] showering with other men [...] lascivious enjoyment [...] lithe naked bodies [...] tempted [...] guys [...] involuntary servitude [...] men [...] beefcake parades

I don't even know what to say to this.

Get help, Joe.